KDA
- Current
- Browse
- Collections
-
For contributors
- For Authors
- Instructions to authors
- Article processing charge
- e-submission
- For Reviewers
- Instructions for reviewers
- How to become a reviewer
- Best reviewers
- For Readers
- Readership
- Subscription
- Permission guidelines
- About
- Editorial policy
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Korean Women with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
- Hee-Sook Kim, Hye-Jung Jang, Jeong-Eun Park, Moon-Young Kim, Sun-Young Ko, Sung-Hoon Kim
- Diabetes Metab J. 2015;39(4):316-320. Published online August 17, 2015
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2015.39.4.316
- 3,347 View
- 35 Download
- 5 Web of Science
- 5 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
PubReader Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes in Korean women with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Methods We performed a retrospective survey of 163 pregnancies in women with type 1 diabetes (
n =13) and type 2 diabetes (n =150) treated from 2003 to 2010 at Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Korea. We compared maternal characteristics as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes between groups.Results Differences in glycosylated hemoglobin between type 1 and type 2 diabetes were not significant. Birth weight (3,501±689.6 g vs. 3,366±531.4 g) and rate of major congenital malformations (7.7% vs. 5.6%) were not significantly different. However, women with type 1 diabetes had higher rates of preeclampsia (38.5% vs. 8.2%,
P =0.006), large for gestational age (LGA; 46.2% vs. 20.4%,P =0.004), macrosomia (38.5% vs. 13.4%,P =0.032), and admission for neonatal care (41.7% vs. 14.8%,P =0.03) than women with type 2 diabetes.Conclusion Maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with type 1 diabetes were poorer than for women with type 2 diabetes, especially preeclampsia, LGA, macrosomia and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Women’s Health and Well-being During Their Reproductive Years: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review
Aycan Celik, Rita Forde, Simona Racaru, Angus Forbes, Jackie Sturt
Current Diabetes Reviews.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Application of the electronic nose in predicting preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies. Pilot study
Karen Beatriz Méndez Rodríguez, Luis Manuel Ramírez Gómez, Leticia Carrizales Yáñez, Rogelio Flores Ramírez, Omar Ornelas-Rebolledo, Jaime Antonio Borjas-García, Francisco Pérez-Vázquez, Maribel Rodríguez Aguilar
Archives of Medical Research.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Obstetric and neonatal complications among women with autoimmune disease
Andrew Williams, Katherine Grantz, Indulaxmi Seeni, Candace Robledo, Shanshan Li, Marion Ouidir, Carrie Nobles, Pauline Mendola
Journal of Autoimmunity.2019; 103: 102287. CrossRef - Effects of maternal age, parity and pre-pregnancy body mass index on the glucose challenge test and gestational diabetes mellitus
Adel T. Abu-Heija, Majeda R. Al-Bash, Moza A. Al-Kalbani
Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences.2017; 12(4): 338. CrossRef - Deficient Vitamin E Uptake During Development Impairs Neural Tube Closure in Mice Lacking Lipoprotein Receptor SR-BI
Nicolás Santander, Carlos Lizama, María José Parga, Alonso Quiroz, Druso Pérez, Guadalupe Echeverría, Lorena Ulloa, Verónica Palma, Attilio Rigotti, Dolores Busso
Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
- The Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Women’s Health and Well-being During Their Reproductive Years: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review
First
Prev
